What Happens To The Primitive Survival Houses?

This site contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Last Updated on June 10, 2023 by Umar

Primitive survival houses, often featured in videos on social media, are typically built by “survival builders” who claim to use natural materials and techniques to create these structures.

However, there have been concerns and allegations that these videos are staged and not as environmentally friendly as they claim to be.

Some issues raised about primitive survival houses include:

  • Use of non-natural materials: Despite claiming to use natural materials like “termite cement,” some builders have been found to use real cement, with discarded bags seen in the surrounding area.
  • Environmental damage: There have been reports of forests in Cambodia being damaged by these survival builders for the sake of creating their videos.
  • Deceptive practices: Some videos have been deemed fraudulent, as they make their survival builds seem realistic, but in reality, they may not be as genuine as they appear.

It is unclear what happens to these primitive survival houses after the videos are filmed.

However, some Reddit users have discussed the state of these buildings the day after content is uploaded, suggesting that they may not be maintained or used for long-term survival purposes

. Overall, it is essential to approach these videos with skepticism and be aware of the potential environmental impact and deceptive practices involved.

What Are The Potential Environmental Consequences Of Using Non-Natural Materials In Primitive Survival Houses?

Using non-natural materials in primitive survival houses can have potential environmental consequences.

Here are some of the possible impacts:

  • Habitat fragmentation and destruction: The use of non-natural materials can lead to habitat fragmentation and destruction, which may lead directly to extinction or isolate organisms in ways.
  • Environmental harm: Many common building materials, even those marketed as sustainable, can cause great harm to the environment. Energy consumption and waste production may also vary among building materials, the environmental impact of which can be substantial.
  • Resource depletion: Non-sustainable rates of harvesting have been common in the real world of open, poorly regulated, bio-resource exploitation. This has happened even where so-called “scientific” management was being used. These facts become clear from the examples of resource degradation described in this chapter.
  • Air pollution: Both indoor and outdoor cultivation systems may be associated with air pollution risks from biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) that can.
  • Reduced need for knowledge of natural history: While vastly increasing the number of people who can camp in a wilderness area without spoiling it, the new methods have also introduced a greater dependence on consumer products and synthetic materials and reduced the need for knowledge of the natural history of the place.

Are There Any Legal Regulations Or Restrictions In Place To Prevent The Environmental Damage Caused By Survival Builders?

There are several legal regulations and restrictions in place to prevent environmental damage caused by construction and development activities.

Here are some relevant points:

  1. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) seeks to promote efforts that will prevent or eliminate damage to the environment and biosphere and stimulate the health and well-being of humans.
  2. Environmental laws attempt to preserve and protect the environment where it is beneficial and tackle the harm and damage where it is not. These laws can include liability, response, investigation, monitoring, and risk assessment of long-term effects.
  3. Executive Order 11990 requires federal agencies to avoid undertaking or providing assistance for new construction located in wetlands unless there is no practicable alternative to such construction.
  4. Enforcement of environmental laws has been stepped up, and landowners, builders, and developers have reacted by condemning the policy basis of environmental regulations.
  5. NOAA Fisheries implements the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to protect and conserve threatened and endangered species and their habitats. Projects that are sited in U.S. waters must meet a suite of federal, state, and local regulations to ensure environmental protection, water quality, food safety, and protection of public health.
  6. The U.S. Army has regulations in place to preserve, protect, conserve, and restore the environment in accordance with federal, state, and local environmental laws and DOD policies.

How Do Allegations Of Deceptive Practices In Primitive Survival House Videos Impact The Credibility Of Survival Builders As A Whole?

The allegations of deceptive practices in primitive survival house videos can have an impact on the credibility of survival builders as a whole in several ways:

  1. Loss of trust: When viewers discover that the videos they have been watching are staged or fake, they may lose trust in the survival builders and the entire genre of primitive building videos.
  2. Damage to reputation: The survival builders who have been accused of deceptive practices may suffer damage to their reputation, which can affect their ability to attract sponsors, advertisers, and viewers.
  3. Negative impact on the industry: The negative publicity surrounding deceptive practices in primitive building videos can have a negative impact on the industry as a whole. It can lead to increased scrutiny and regulation, which can make it more difficult for legitimate survival builders to operate.
  4. Impact on media culture: The impact of media practices and roles in America is profound. The allegations of deceptive practices in primitive survival house videos can have an impact on media culture by raising questions about the authenticity of content and the role of media in shaping public perception.
  5. Impact on governance: The politics of poverty and governance can have a profound impact on the lives of the poorest and most vulnerable. The allegations of deceptive practices in primitive survival house videos can raise questions about governance and the role of government in regulating media practices to protect consumers from fraud and deception.

Helpful Resources